Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Del/2018 and ITA No.3045/Del/2018 dated 19.12.2018 remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for considering the matter afresh, after affording an opportunity to the assessees to put forth their defense on all aspects, as directed by the High Court. 2. Facts, to the limited extent necessary, are that the assessees filed their return of income for the Assessment Year 2009-10. On the ground that some part of the income had escaped assessment, proceedings under Section 147 of the Act were initiated, by issuing a notice under Section 148 thereof on 31.03.2016. The appellants-assessees filed their reply stating that the original return of income may be treated as the return filed in response to the notice under Section 148 of the Act. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the submission of the assessees that, when the order was passed on 26.12.2016 by the learned Single Judge, they could not have prosecuted their defense effectively before the learned Assessing Officer as only five days were left for the assessment to be completed; the order of the High Court was dated 26.12.2016, and the assessment order was passed on 30.12.2016; and, in such circumstances, they were of the view that, because of the paucity of time, the assessees could not conduct their defense effectively under Section 148 of the Act. The Tribunal deemed it just and proper to set-aside the impugned order, and remand the matter to the Assessing Officer for considering the matter afresh after affording an opportunity to the assessees to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld have determined the factual dispute regarding effective service of notice under Section 148(1) of the Act; and it ought not to have relegated the matter to the Assessing Officer to examine the matter afresh. 8. As noted hereinabove, the learned Single Judge had, in his order in Writ Petition (M/S) No.2804 and 2813 of 2016 dated 26.12.2016, permitted the assessees to approach the Assessing Officer. In the order under appeal the Tribunal having taken note of the fact that the assessees had a very little time to put forth their defense, set-aside the impugned order; and had directed the assessing officer to examine the matter afresh, leaving it open to the assessees to raise all such contentions as were available to them in law. Exercise....