2019 (3) TMI 606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... respondent ORDER Per: C J Mathew Appeal of M/s Kaneri Industries challenges order-in-appeal no. P-II/AV/120/2010 dated 29th July 2010 of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-II), Pune, which has upheld the order of the original authority confirming demand of Rs. 3,32,538/- as duties of central excise under section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944, with interest thereon, and imposing penal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es have clubbed the total value of goods dealt with by them for the entire year and thus pushed them beyond the exemption limit specified in the notification supra. Learned Counsel further submits that the suppliers of castings, M/s Netmech Founders Pvt Ltd and M/s Nipurn Engineering Pvt Ltd, had also been proceeded against for alleged clandestine clearances and that, while the charges against the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Tribunal in Sanket Food Products Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad [2005 (188) ELT 107 (Tri.Del.)] relied upon by Revenue does not apply to the facts of the present case and that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara - II v. Sotex [2007 (209) ELT 9 (SC) and on Orissa Bridge and Construction Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ad not effected any manufacture prior to that, mere submission to that effect does not suffice to support this claim. It is, doubtlessly, impossible for any entity to establish a non-event but, considering the capability of machining and finishing parts of automobiles in the factory of manufacture, such a claim cannot be accepted without other evidence. This is more so as the appellant had sought ....