2019 (3) TMI 433

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and MGST Act"] by M/s. Taraltec Solutions Private Limited (herein after referred to as the "Appellant") against the Advance Ruling No. GST-ARA-47/2017-18/B-54 dated 22.06.2018 = 2018 (10) TMI 682 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA. BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE A. The Appellant are manufacturers of Reactor, which is a part of Hand Pump, used in villages to extract water below the earth surface. B. The reactor manufactured by the appellant ensures disinfec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erial/documents like the product catalogue, brochure, diagram or any other relevant material to ascertain the nature and function of products." 3. The above is not factually correct. Actually, in response to the request made by the concerned officer, we had submitted required documents on 2 nd May, 2018. 4. In paragraph "Additional written submission dated 27.03.2018 by the Department, it is stated that in sub-para 4 that "the applicant has further stated that other application of the reactor in pipe line are: (i) to be fitted for wells, ponds, lakes etc. to motorized pipelines; (ii) to be fitted in building with overhead tank; (iii) swimming pool/fountain; (iv) sewage water treatment in township, hotels, hospitals etc. 5. The Appel\....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Asstt. Commissioner, CGST, Div. VII, Mumbai East, opposed the arguments of the Appellant. Discussions and Findings 9. We have gone through the submissions made by the appellant and the respondent along with the ruling pronounced by the Advance Ruling Authority. On perusal of the appeal and submissions made by the appellant as well as the respondents in the instant case, the question before us to decide is, whether the Reactor manufactured by the Appellant (herein after referred to us "the impugned product") can be considered as parts of the hand pumps or otherwise. 10. First of all, we would like to discuss the nature, design and functions of the impugned product. As per the Appellant, the impugned product is retrofitted to the hand pump....