Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2019 (3) TMI 357

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rier, SC, V. Abraham Markos, Abraham Joseph Markos, Isaac Thomas, Haran Thomas George, Chandapillai Abraham P.G., Smt. Rachel Abraham and Jerie Ramesh, Advocates, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT The petitioner, in 1996, obtained a No Objection Certificate from the Gram Panchayat concerned, and started to construct a seven-star resort, by Vembanad Lake, said to be 40 kms., away from the coastlin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l against the Ext. P1, it filed this writ petition, instead. 4. The petitioner's counsel submits that the proceedings pending before the Supreme Court have nothing to do with the issue raised in this writ petition. He also submits that the scope of writ petition is very much limited: the respondent authorities should not dispose of the goods until the issue before the Supreme Court gets re....

PrevPreviousNextNext