2019 (2) TMI 1597

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tax<br>AKIL KURESHI & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. Ms. Alisha Pinto i/by Mihir Naniwadekar for the Appellant Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No. 1 &nbsp; P.C.: 1. These appeals arise in similar background. They have been heard together and would be disposed of by this common order. 2. Since reference was made to the documents in Income Tax Appeal No. 1469 of 2016, same will be treated as lead....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Assessing Officer. The assessee filed return of income in which additional income was disclosed but it was stated that such additional income was disclosed to buy peace and on the condition that no penalty proceedings would be initiated. The Assessing Officer framed assessment pursuant to assessee's return under Section 153A of the Act and made the suitable additions. He also instituted....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the matter in appeal. The Tribunal reversed the order of the Commissioner upon which the assessee has filed this appeal. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we do not find any error in the view of the Tribunal. The order of the assessment under Section 153A of the Act has become final. The assessee has not questioned the additions further. It is true that the penalty procee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d on condition that the penalty proceedings would not be instituted. Both grounds not found favour with the Supreme Court in case of MAK DATA P Ltd Vs. CIT (2013) 358 ITR 593 (SC). We also notice that the assessee has not built up any case for arguing that the receipt in question was not in the nature of income. Merely by stating so and relying on the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT, Nag....