2019 (2) TMI 1345

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ORDER PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-14, Chennai in ITA No.208/CIT(A)-14/2015-16 dated 23.05.2018 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. Mr.S.Bharath represented on behalf of the Revenue and Mr.K.Ravi represented on behalf of the Assessee. 3. In this appeal, the Revenue has raised the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal was against the action of Ld.CIT(A) in allowing the assessee's claim of deduction u/s.54F of the Act in respect of purchase of a new property along with his brother, Mr.Deniel Manohar Raj. The ld.D.R vehemently supported the order of ld. Assessing Officer. 5. In reply, ld.A.R submitted that the assessee had sold a residential property and reinvested in other investments viz. Capital Gai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i). The ld.A.R vehemently supported the order of the CIT(Appeals). 6. We have considered the rival submissions. Admittedly, the assessee has invested his entire capital gains in the acquisition of a new residential property. Admittedly, the joint owner has also categorically admitted that he has not made any investments in the construction of the property in the name of the assessee. Just becau....