2019 (2) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ided by a common order, giving rise to four revision applications, details of the same are as below: Sales / Trade Tax Revision No. Appeal No. Assessment Year 318 of 2018 419 of 2016 2005-06 (U.P.) 321 of 2018 418 of 2016 2005-06 (Central) 320 of 2018 417 of 2016 2006-07 (U.P.) 316 of 2018 416 of 2016 2006-07 (Central) 3. The assessee was subjected to assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for the assessment year in question. In those proceedings, the assessee had filed photocopies of certain Form C and bills claimed to have been issued by M/s Raj Enterprises, Uttarakhand to M/s Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd, Ajmer, Rajasthan. Such documents had been filed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en sold by M/s Raj Enterprises, the dealer at Uttarakhand. 6. Even at that stage, the assessee did not lead any evidence either in the shape of statements of the seller or the purchaser or their certificates or other credible evidence to establish preexistence of the contract of commission agency, in favour of the assessee. The assessing officer imposed tax liability on the assessee for the quantities of molasses sold to M/s Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd. 7. The first appeal from such assessment order, came to be rejected by an exparte order dated 29.2.2016. Before the Tribunal, the assessee filed certain documents in support of it's claim of commission agency. However, those documents were not proved by way of additional....