Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (9) TMI 39

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tax Act, 1961, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal at the instance of the Revenue, has referred the following two questions for the opinion of this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that as and when the assessee effected the purchases of shoes from cobblers, the assessee's liability to pay the ta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of that amount is paid by the assessee to the State Government or is refunded to a party, it would qualify for deduction in the computation of the total taxable income in the year. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax upheld the action of the Income-tax Officer taking the view that the said amount consisted of sales tax charged by the assessee from its customers but was no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....id not alter the legal position. The decision of the Tribunal is in conformity with the view expressed by this court in CIT v. Poonam Chand Trilok Chand [1976] 105 ITR 618; CIT v. Brijmohan Das Laxman Das [1979] 117 ITR 121 (All). Learned counsel for the parties agree that the controversy in issue is now covered by a decision of the Supreme Court in Jonnalla Narashimharao and Co. v. CIT [199....