Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2019 (1) TMI 1040

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant Shri. K. Veerabhadra Reddy, ADC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Madhu Mohan Damodhar : The issue involved in this appeal concerns the demand of service tax liability on construction of mobile tower foundation and related civil works performed by the appellant for M/s. Bharathi Airtel Ltd. during the period from December 2004 to June 2007. 2. The Department had taken the view....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hearing, on behalf of the appellant, Ld. Consultant Shri. S. Ramachandran made oral and written submissions which can be broadly summarized as under : (i) Impugned demand has been made against the appellant under CICS. However, the appellant had executed the work on Works Contract basis on "with material basis" as evidenced by the work order submitted by the appellant. (ii) The same is also conf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uilders Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T. - 2018 (9) G.S.T.L. 257 (Tri. - Chennai); * M/s. Trichy Construction Co. Vs. C.C.E., Trichy - 2017-TIOL-1532-CESTAT-MAD; * M/s. RRB Energy Ltd. Vs. Commr. of S.T. - 2016 (45) S.T.R. 187 (Tri. - Chennai); * M/s. URC Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Salem - 2017 (50) S.T.R. 147 (Tri. - Chennai); * M/s. Engineers India Technical Consultants Vs. C.C.E. & S.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppropriation of the same is very much in order. 5. After hearing both sides and going through the facts on record, we find that the Ld. Consultant is correct in his assertion that the issue in dispute is squarely covered by the case laws cited by him, in particular, that of the Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (supra) for the period up to 01.06.2007. 6. For the period after 01.06.....