Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t herein is a broker /commission agent dealing with various items of iron and steel products i.e. MS ingots, re-rolled products etc. falling under Chapter Heading No. 72 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The instant case was initiated when name of the appellant Noticee No.1 of impugned SCN was found mentioned in the incriminating records of M/s. Monu Steels, the another manufacturer of ingots. Based thereupon the Department alleged that the appellant had suppressed the production and clandestinely removed 28297.0 MT of M.S. Ingots and has evaded duty. Hence the impugned SCN No.7836 dated 06.10.2010 was served upon the appellant proposing demand of Rs. 8,21,08,631/- quantified on the basis of excess electricity consumption including the du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....verting these arguments, ld. DR has submitted that the adjudicating authority has passed a speaking and reasoned order based on the documentary evidence. No question arises for setting aside of the same. Appeal is prayed to be rejected. 7. After hearing both the parties and pursuing the record, we observe that the initial demand of Rs. 8,21,08,631/- has already been dropped to the major extent of Rs. 8,00,40,529/- qua excess consumption of electricity, relying upon the decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of RA Castings Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2011 (269) ELT A 108 (S.C.). We do not find any infirmity in the order to that extent. The similar issue is no more res-integra as stand already been decided in favour of assessee. Therefore, t....