2019 (1) TMI 732
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....padhyay, JJ. Shri Sourav Bagaria and Arindam Chandra, Advocates, for the Appellant. ORDER The Court : The respondents are not represented even at the second call. 2. The appeal is directed against an order dated April 7, 2016 passed on a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. 3. By filing the petition in the year 2004, the appellants herein, in effect, wanted to d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lants. The other ground that weighed with the Appellate Tribunal was that despite the appellants' assertion that they sought an adjournment of the matter on July 13, 1987, the appellants apparently chose not to make any enquiry as to what happened in their matter till the year 2002. The Writ Court refused to extend its beneficial jurisdiction to the appellants on the ground of the conduct of the a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed in any manner or form without the intermediate orders (meaning, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and the order of the Appellate Tribunal) being found to be erroneous. Since neither order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or the Appellate Tribunal was erroneous and since such authorities took relevant considerations into account in dismissing the belated plea of the appellants, the Court of t....
TaxTMI