2019 (1) TMI 619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Petitioner. Shri R. Aravindan, SCGSC, for the Respondent. ORDER These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the first respondent, dated 28-3-2018, whereby and whereunder the first respondent directed the respondents to pay their respective duty as quantified in the demand notices. 2. The issue involved in these writ petitions are on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly passed the impugned order on 28-3-2018, directing the petitioners to pay their respective duties. Challenging the said order, the petitioners are before this Court. 4. The only ground on which the impugned order sought to be quashed by the petitioners is that though the respondents issued notice for personal hearing, the first respondent has not given an opportunity of personal hearing ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ded to issue a letter to Mr. Hansraj Bansal to appear on that day. However, the PH could not be held on that date due to administrative reasons. The submission dated 6-3-2018 by M/s. S.R. Traders and R. Selvaraj together was taken on record. Though the counsel requested for a fresh date, the matter was discussed with the counsel and with his oral consent, the case is taken up for adjudication." ....