2019 (1) TMI 503
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., JUDICIAL MEMBER And MR. P. ANJANI KUMAR, TECHNICAL MEMBER Mr. Kuryan Thomas, Advocate For the Appellant Mr. P. Rajan, AR For the Respondent ORDER Per: P. ANJANI KUMAR Paulos Geogre Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., the appellants, are engaged in civil construction works. The appellants were classifying the subject activity as works contract for the purpose of assessment under Kerala VAT....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... demonstrate that the same was a work contract. As accepted by the Commissioner, the work was supply and filling of sand and red earth, construction of two ponds and protection walls for the irrigation canal passing through the premises. Even going by the discussion given by the Commissioner, the service was a composite activity. In respect of other works undertaken by the appellants, he submitted....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e issues is prior to 01.06.2007 therefore the demands are not sustainable. 3. The Ld. AR for the Department has reiterated the findings of OIO. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records of the case. We find that in respect of the work categorized as "site formation and clearance, excavation, earth moving and demolition services". The appellants have produced a certification from VAT Author....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI