2019 (1) TMI 363
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ner : Mrs.Aparna Nandakumar For the Respondent : Mr.V.Haribabu, Additional Government Pleader COMMON ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the orders of assessment dated 30.11.2018 and dated 07.12.2018 passed in respect of assessment years 2009-10 to 2012-13 and 2013-14 respectively. 2. Mr.V.Haribabu, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se objections. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that merely because the other end dealers have reported only the part of the sale effected to them and not all the sales and tax thereon, the petitioner cannot be faulted and imposed with the tax liability, especially, when they have the purchase invoices with them for claiming the ITC. The learned counsel further contended that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... sales. In other words, petitioner is not having any grievance against the assessment orders passed in respect of the other issues. It is seen that in respect of the disputed issues, the petitioner, in pursuant to the notice of proposal, has sent a detailed reply on 12.05.2015 and 14.05.2016. 9. Though the Assessing Officer extracted the whole reply in the assessment orders, has however, not de....
TaxTMI