Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eep Kumar Dubey Superintendent AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar, After hearing both the sides duly represented by learned advocate Ms. Stuti Saggi appearing for the appellant and learned A.R. Shri Pradeep Kumar Dubey appearing for the Revenue, I find that the Revenue involved in the present appeal is Rs. 17,44,975/-. I note that the appellants were manufacturing Calcined ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... allegations that in the garb of inputs namely Raw Petroleum Coke, finished goods namely Calcined Petroleum Coke were cleared by debiting cenvat credit availed. (e.) when the inputs were cleared as such the cenvat credit availed was debited, whereas, as per valuation of the inputs so cleared higher amount of debit was needed to be done. 2. The matter was initially adjudicated on 31.10.2000 w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nly two issues remained viz. (a) & (b) above. One at Serial No. a & b which were remanded by this Tribunal to the Original Authority. In compliance to this Tribunal's Final Order dated 02.09.2014, learned Commissioner has passed impugned order and confirmed demand of around Rs. 64 thousand in respect of issue (a) and around Rs. 16 lakhs in respect of the issue (b). In addition penalties were impos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in gate passes was net weight. I find that Central Excise duty is to be paid on net weight because the purchaser of the goods has paid for goods which are covered by net weight and the demand is not confirmed on the basis of net weight. I find that demand is confirmed on the basis of gross weight, therefore, the said confirmation is not sustainable. I, therefore, set aside confirmation of demand....