Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 1523

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court and challenged the impugned proceedings namely, the order of assessment dated 29.12.2017 passed in respect of assessment year 2010-11 and the demand notice issued under section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, calling upon the petitioner and 14 others to pay a sum of Rs. 32,11,010/- being the tax arrears. 2. The case of the petitioner before thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the said Sulochana. She further stated that she does not come within the purview of relative as defined under section 2(41) of the Income Tax Act. 3. A counter affidavit is filed by the respondent wherein it is stated that the petitioner is residing in the same property where the deceased assessee Sadagopan Sulochana was residing at the time of her death. Therefore, it is contended by the resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tive, as defined under section 2(41), does not include the relationship between the petitioner and the deceased assessee. Therefore, I find that the order of assessment and the consequential demand issued on the petitioner by treating the petitioner as the relative of the deceased cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Merely because the petitioner is residing in the same property where the deceas....