TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (12) TMI 1007
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....yakumar for the petitioner. For the Respondent : M. Hariharan , Additional Government Pleader, for the respondent. ORDER T. S. Sivagnanam J.- 1. Heard Mr. D. Vijayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. M. Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this court for the second time concerning the very same....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ne with regard to the classification of the product, which according to the petitioner has been exported and what is the rate of duty payable on such product. Second is whether the petitioner is entitled to grant of exemption on the product, as it has been exported. So far as the first issue is concerned, the respondent has treated the water purification plant as "machinery" under entry No. 69 of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... proceedings of the Authority for Clarification Advance Ruling dated September 4, 2014, in ACAAR No. 84/2013-14, the respondent has not given any reasons as to why the clarification cannot be accepted and why it has to be treated as machinery under entry No. 69 of Part C. The respondent, if seeks to distinguish the product manufactured by the petitioner to be different from what was dealt with by ....