Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (3) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....During the course of assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has claimed a loss of Rs. 1,05,489 on account of loss on sale of shares. The Assessing Officer has referred the details of purchase and sale of the shares and made annexures in the assessment order. The Assessing Officer further found that there were two sets of share brokers---one set of M. L. Santhalia and Sew Karan Dhelia. The shares are of J. K. Synthetics Ltd., Tata Tea Ltd., Hindustan Aluminium and Gwalior Rayon Co. These shares were purchased by the assessee from M. L. Santhalia and the entire lot was sold to Sew Karan Dhelia. Another set of brokers consisted of R. Rameshwarlal and J. M. Choudhury. The assessee purchased shares of India Steamships Ltd., ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at on scrutiny, the Income-tax Officer found that some shares are purchased and sold on the same date even some sales have been shown to a third party, though he did not receive the shares on that date. It further supports the order of the Income-tax Officer. Learned counsel for the assessee, Mr. Khaitan, submits that they have not taken the ground that the finding of the Tribunal is perverse. The question which is based on the finding of fact should not be answered in favour of the Revenue if that finding is not challenged on the ground of perversity. He further submits, on the merits also, that the purchase and sale is not on the same date. Details are annexed in the assessment order. Though some shares were sold before the actual delive....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rs (Rs.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ J. K. Synthetics Ltd : 24-11-1983 24-1-1984 2,100 1,02,480 M. L. Santhalia 24-1-1984 8-2-1984 2,100 91,518 Sew Karan Dhelia (-) 10,962 24-11-1983 27-12-1983 3,500 1,71,500 M. L. Santhalia 12-12-1983 9-1-1984 3,500 1,58,830 Sew Karan Dhelia (-) 12,670 Tata Tea Limited : 25-11-1983 24-1-1984 1,900 70,060 M. L. Santhalia 24-1-1984 8-2-1984 1,900 (-) 63,612 Sew Karan Dhelia (-) 7,448 Hindustan Aluminium Ltd. : 12-12-1983 27-12-1983 1,000 49,000 M. L. Santhalia 16-12-1983 9-1-1984 1,000 46,880 Sew Karan Dhelia (-) 2,120 Gwalior Rayon Co. : 15-12-1983 27-12-1983 1,500 83....