Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1999 (4) TMI 21

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct of the cane purchased, the assessee which is a sugar mill had after the end of this year of account paid the purchase tax payable on that part of the price paid subsequent to the end of the accounting year. The assessee claimed that the additional price which it was bound to pay and had paid should also be allowed as a deduction. The Income-tax Officer was of the view that the amount so paid ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and above the amount of Rs. 212 per metric tonne, which had already been paid by the sugar mills for the cane supplied during the previous year. The accounting year ended on September 30, 1981. It is also not in dispute that the amount so paid by the assessee was towards the price for the cane supplied to them and the assessee had also paid the purchase tax on that additional price. In so far as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed that the liability for payment of tax, even though determined finally long after the end of the accounting year must be regarded as relating back to the time at which the liability for payment of tax had been incurred and that the date of determination of the final liability is not decisive as to the year for which the assessee can claim the deduction. The assessee maintains its accounts in th....