TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (10) TMI 210
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... After hearing both the sides, I find that proceedings for confirmation of demand, on the ground of clandestine removal, were initiated against one M/s Diwan Industries, a partnership firm. Inasmuch as the proprietor of the present appellant M/s Mahavir Industries, Shri Prabhat Jain was one of the partners in M/s Diwan Industries, notice also proposed confirmation of demand against M/s Mahavir I....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oncerned, they took up the matter before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, by way of filing a writ petition which was rejected, and as a consequence, the appellant deposited the directed amount in question. On such deposit, their appeal was taken up for final disposal and vide Final Order No. 50135/2017 dated 6.1.2017, their appeal was allowed. 4. As a consequence of their allowing of their appeal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....enue's stand is that since the proprietor of the present unit is a partner in M/s Diwan Industries and the arrears against the partnership firm can be recovered from the partners, the appropriation of the refund sanctioned to the proprietary unit is legal and proper. However, I find that there is no dispute about the fact that proceedings were initiated against M/s Mahavir Industries by treating t....