Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 797

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ala Chander for Ms.K.Kavitha & A.G.Esther Dorothy COMMON JUDGMENT T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J. These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA Nos.1395, 1632, 1633, 1634, 1396 & 1635/Mds/2016, dated 19.11.2007. 2. Heard Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned counsel for the Revenue and Mr.J.Bala Chander, learned counsel for the assesse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llowable in respect of the payments not yet made, as at the close of the relevant assessment year? " 4. Learned counsel for the Revenue and assessee would fairly submit that the questions of law raised in these appeals have already been decided against the Revenue. For better reference, tax case appeal numbers, corresponding appeal numbers before the Tribunal, Assessment Year and the question o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ght in holding that the expenditure incurred on issue of shares is eligible to be amortised u/s 35D of the Income Tax Act? 990 of 2008 1632/M/06 DA 1998-99 991 of 2008 1633/M/06 DA 1998-99 993 of 2008 1396/M/06 AA 2000-01 994 of 2008 1635/M/06 DA 2000-01 989 of 2008 1395/M/06 AA 1998-99 3 Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that where the ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Private Limited [(2012) 340 ITR 593 (SC)]. (ii) the second substantial question of law is decided against the Revenue in the light of the decision of the assessee's own case in Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [388 ITR 1 SC]. (iii) the third substantial question of law is decided against the Revenue by relying upon the decision of the Hon'....