Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (4) TMI 1397

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per : Anita Sumanth, J.]. - These Departmental Civil Miscellaneous Appeals challenge an order of the CESTAT dated 8-9-2009 [2010 (252) E.L.T. 128 (Tri. - Chennai)] raising the following substantial question of Law :  "Whether the "date of shipment" is relevant date for the purpose of amendment of shipping bill as stipulated under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962?" 2. The assessee respo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ipt issued by the Mate i.e., Captain of the Vessel as well as the bill of lading were relied upon stating that the same were contemporaneous with shipping and thus establish the actual quantity of the contents shipped. The request was however, turned down by the Commissioner of Customs (Export) holding that no evidence had been let in to establish the actual quantity available at the time of expor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....antum of exports after 14-9-2007 might well have been inflated. 4. The CESTAT, in an appeal filed by the appellant noted the nature of the cargo, being cane molasses and the manner of storage and loading into the Vessel by way of pumping from the storage tank. The Bench observes that it was not possible for the Dock Officers to have verified the actual quantity of molasses in the tank on the....