Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 504

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ficer in the Income Tax Department and is working at Madurai from 07.05.2009 onwards. Between 2002 and 2007, he was working in the Office of the Income Tax Department at Pollachi and thereafter, he was transferred to Ramanathapuram before being posted to Madurai. While he was working at Pollcachi, for the purpose of his banking operations, he opened a Savings Bank Account bearing No.611201505667 with ICICI Bank Limited, Pollachi. On his transfer from Pollcachi, the petitioner for the purpose of closing the bank account contacted the Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Limited, Pollachi and as per the advice of the Branch Manager of the Bank, the ATM card and un-used, un-filled and unsigned cheque leafs were returned by the petitioner through registe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he petitioner had filed the quash petition. 6.The learned counsel for the petitioner further contended that the petitioner has no liability towards the respondent and taking advantage of the petitioner's position as a Senior Officer in the Income Tax Department, the Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Limited, Pollachi and the respondent are trying to exploit and extract money from him and there is no whisper of any legal recoverable debt in the complaint and further, continuation of the proceedings before the Lower Court is an abuse of process of law. 7.The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner is liable to pay the debt to the respondent and the cheque in question had been given by the petitioner in discharge of the l....