2016 (10) TMI 1225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....O AND DR. ANITA SUMANTH, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. P. Rajavelu for M/s R. Senniappan For The Respondent : Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai, Standing Counsel for the Department JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, J.) The Assessee has preferred this Revision under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act,1959 to revise the common order passed b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reme Court Judgement in (1997) 107 STC 571 (State of Karnataka vs. Ashraf & Co) dealing with on alien Act for a different purpose containing specific provision in the statute as "sale in the State", which provision is not there in Sec. 3(4) of the TNGST Act 1959? 3. The petitioner is a manufacturer of Shoes and Shoe uppers in Tamil Nadu. The manufactured products are exported by it. In the proc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar that for attracting the provision contained in sub-section (4) of Section 3 of the Act, the crucial question of fact to be decided is whether the sale has taken at a place outside the State either by way of branch transfer or by transfer in any other manner for the purpose of selling the same at the place which is falling outside the State. 4. In cases where the manufactured goods are sold b....