2018 (9) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The brief facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in providing taxable services under the category of Advertising Service and holding a valid service tax registration No. AADHR2726RST001. During the course of audit of the records of the appellants, it was observed that the income shown in the Profit and Loss accounts was exceeded by Rs. 5,27,45,530....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed by the said OIO, the appellant filed the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), wherein the Commissioner (Appeals) vide impugned order modified the order in original to the extent that the demand beyond 5 years was set aside and accordingly the adjudicating authority was directed to re-quantify the demand. However, the demand for the rest of the period was upheld along with interest. The Ld.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erly considered by the adjudicating authority. He submits that at the relevant period, the service tax was chargeable only on the actual receipt of the gross value of service provided, whereas in the balance sheet entire billed value is booked. Therefore, the total income shown in the balance sheet does not represent the actual receipt of gross value. Therefore, there is a grave error in this resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....¢ CCE vs Nemimath Fabrics P. Ltd. 2010 (256) ELT 369 (Guj.) • Salasar Dyg. & Ptg. Mills P. Ltd. vs CCE Surat-I 2013 (290) ELT 322 (Guj.) 3. Sh. L. Patra, Ld. Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He submits that as per the Annexure-A of SCN demand was rightly quantified, therefore, no interference is required ....