2018 (8) TMI 1678
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Nainawati For The Respondent : Chintan H Dave And Jaimin A Gandhi IA ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. This tax appeal was admitted for considering following substantial questions of law: "(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the CESTAT was right in dismissing the appeal when the orders challenged before it have travelled beyond show....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... under : "Both sides duly represented by Shri A.D.Maru, learned advocate appearing for the appellants and Smt. A.Vasudev, Jt. CDR appearing for the Revenue, fairly agree that the disputed issue as to whether the reroller, whose aggregate value of clearances in a financial year have exceeded Rs. 75 lakhs, are eligible or not for the benefit of deemed credit, stands decided by Larger Bench ....
TaxTMI