Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 1065

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in ITA No.3612/Del/2016 and relates to Assessment Year 2011-2012. 3. The impugned order upholds addition of Rs. 27,33,333/- made by the Assessing Officer and affirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on account of unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 82,00,000/- made on different dates in the joint bank account of the appellant-assessee along with two others. 4. Factum that Rs. 82,00,000/- was deposited in cash in the joint bank account on different dates is not disputed and under challenge. 5. Appellant has drawn our attention to the cash flow chart, enclosed as annexure-4 to the appeal, and submits that Rs. 1,52,00,000/- was withdrawn in cash from the joint bank account on different dates between 3.5.2010 till 4.1.2011. Rs. 82,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case of Jauhari Mal Goel 201 CTR 54 (.All.) held that deposit in the bank account would amount to investment under section 69 of the I. T. Act. Therefore, there is no merit in the contention of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee that no addition could be made on account of cash deposited in the bank account of assessee and others. The contention of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee is, therefore, rejected. 7. As regards addition on merit, the A.O. has specifically noted that assessee could not proved at the assessment stage that out of cash withdrawn, some payments have been made to the contractors/suppliers and balance cash in hand has been deposited subsequently. The assessee did not make any cheque payment for construction. The A.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r construction only. Similarly, on 11th June, 2010 assessee has withdrawn Rs. 10 lakhs from the bank but it was not used either for redeposit or for construction purpose up to 30th June, 20 10 because on 30th June, 2010 assessee claimed deposit of Rs. 1 lakh only. Similarly, on 29th July, 2010 and 30th July, 2010, no amount have been withdrawn from the bank but assessee claimed redeposit of Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 2,50,000 on both the days as well as claimed Rs. 5 lakhs spent for construction. Similarly, from 2nd August, 2010 to 5th August,2010 assessee has withdrawn Rs. 30 lakhs from the bank but claimed construction expenses of Rs. 5 lakhs only on 5th August, 2010. Thereafter, from 7th August, 20 10 to 1 8 t h August, 20 10,there is no withdr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....case of the assessee. This ground of appeal is accordingly dismissed." 7. Cash flow statement filed before us as annexure-4 and relied upon by the appellant-assessee is reproduced hereunder:- S.No. Date Amount Withdrawn (Rs.) Utilisation of cash withdrawn Balance (Rs.)       Re-deposit Used for Total   1 3.5.2010 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000   2 4.5.2010 8,00,000   8,00,000 8,00,000   3 5.5.2010 12,00,000       12,00,000 4 5.5.2010 12,00,000       24,00,000 5 5.5.2010 12,00,000       36,00,000 6 20.5.2010 10,00,000       46,00,000 7 24.5.2010   ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 18.11.2010 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000   31 3.1.2011 7,00,000   7,00,000 7,00,000   32 4.1.2011 5,00,000       5,00,000 33 4.1.2011 5,00,000       10,00,000 34 31.1.2011   5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 35 31.1.2011   5,00,000   5,00,000 - 36 9.2.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - 37 23.2.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - 38 1.3.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - 39 2.3.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - 40 7.3.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - 41 11.3.2011 5,00,000   5,00,000 5,00,000 - &n....