2018 (8) TMI 809

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) for the Revenue ORDER Per Mrs. Archana Wadhwa: The challenge in the present appeal is to demand of Service Tax of Rs. 68,890/- (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety Only) confirmed by the lower authorities along with confirmation of interest and imposition of penalty of identical amount. 2. Ld.Advocate has assailed the impugned confirmation on the point of time bar inasmuch....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... In such a scenario, there can be no mala fide on their part to evade the payment of Service Tax. 4. The lower authorities in their impugned orders have invoked the longer period on the sole ground that the appellant did not bring the above facts into the knowledge of the Revenue. 5. I find no merits in the above contentions of the department. Admittedly the entire facts have been taken by the a....