2004 (9) TMI 681
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the parties. Rule. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith. 2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 16th October, 2003 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, partly allowing the application of the petitioner to summon and examine the complainant and thereafter, permit the petitioner to cross-examine the complainant. The impugned order dated 16th October, 2003 only all....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is contended by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that a perusal of the said affidavit shows that there is nothing vague in the said affidavit and therefore, there is no need for the complainant to be called for the purpose of recording his examination-in-chief. The affidavit filed is sufficient and this in keeping with the spirit of the amendment which is to expedite the hearing and dispos....
TaxTMI