Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (6) TMI 1274

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1961 (for short "the Act"). 3. Brief facts are, the assessee an individual filed his return of income for the impugned assessment year on 28th July 2011, declaring total income of Rs. 4,91,750. Subsequently, the assessee filed a revised return of income under section 139(5) of the Act on 20th October 2012, declaring total income of Rs. 6,24,050. In the said revised return of income the assessee while offering long term capital gain of Rs. 49,96,681, claimed deduction of the said amount under section 54 of the Act towards investment of an amount of Rs. 1,15,00,000 in a new residential house. Thus, in effect, no capital gain was offered to tax. Alleging that the assessee filed the revised return of income after issuance of notice under se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the conditions of section 139(5) of the Act, such revised return of income has to be taken into consideration. He submitted, while the Assessing Officer has rejected the revised return of income as invalid, at the same time he has accepted the income offered in the revised return of income including the long term capital gain and has only rejected assessee's claim of deduction under section 54 of the Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned Authorised Representative submitted, even if the assessee had not claimed deduction under section 54 of the Act before the Assessing Officer, he can claim such deduction before the Appellate Authorities. He submitted, though by way of an additional ground the assessee has claim....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by stating that the revised return of income filed by the assessee is invalid since it was filed after issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Act. Thus, as could be seen, the Assessing Officer has not entirely rejected the revised return of income filed by the assessee. When it comes to the income offered in the revised return of income, he has accepted it, whereas, when it comes to deduction claimed under section 54 of the Act, the Assessing Officer conveniently rejects the revised return of income filed by the assessee. Thus, the Assessing Officer has adopted a very selective approach in respect of the revised return of income filed by the assessee. A careful reading of the provisions contained under section 139(5) of the Act wil....