2018 (6) TMI 1249

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Rs - for the respondent ORDER Per Ms. Archana Wadhwa: The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products which are also being exported by them. 2. After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Mehul Jivani, ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant and Shri S. Nunthuk & Shri P. Junega, ld. DRs appearing for the Revenue, I find that the disputed issue relates....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fied the reversal. He also observed that in the operative part of the order, the original adjudicating authority has not mentioned about the dropping of the demand, which renders the same as a non-speaking order. Accordingly, he remanded the matter on the said count for re-verification. As regards, the assessee's appeal, he upheld the duty confirmation to the extent of Rs. 14,359/- along with p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntention to evade any duty. 5. Ld. AR appearing for the Revenue submits that admittedly the order of the Assistant Commissioner, in the operative part, has nowhere specified dropping of the demand in respect of reversal of Cenvat credit in respect of written off of raw materials and packing list. He submits that even if the Assistant Commissioner has gone by the report by the Supdt., the assess....