Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 1361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... valuation of shares held in Visteon Powertrain Control Systems India Pvt. Ltd. 3. Sh. R. Vijayaraghavan, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that for the purpose of transfer of shares held by the assessee in Visteon Powertrain Control Systems India Pvt. Ltd., the assessee valued the same at Rs. 10.32 per share. However, the Assessing Officer estimated the valuation at Rs. 36.31 per share. Referring to the order of this Tribunal dated 12.11.2013 in I.T.A. No.17(Mds)/2012 in M/s VIHI, LLC, v. Addl DIT (International Taxation) [2014] 62 SOT 25/42 taxmann.com 304 (Chennai - Trib) the Ld.counsel submitted that VIHI is also one of the co-transferors. In that case, the Tribunal accepted the valuation made by the assessee at Rs. 10.32 pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ince there was transaction of sale of shares between the assessee-company and Visteon International Holdings Mauritius Ltd., the Assessing Officer found that the transaction has to be made only at arm's length price. The Transfer Pricing Officer, by adopting cash discount method of valuation, had determined the value of 7366765 shares of Visteon Powertrain Control Systems India Pvt. Ltd. at Rs. 81,15,78,422/-. In other words, the Transfer Pricing Officer determined the value of shares by following the cash discount method at Rs. 36.31 per share. According to the Ld. D.R., the average value of share, as per Chartered Accountant's valuation was Rs. 22.50 per share as on 31.03.2007. Despite this valuation, according to the Ld. D.R., th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal in I.T.A. No. 17/Mds./2012 dated 12.11.2013. 8. We have carefully gone through the order of this Tribunal for the assessment year 2007-08 in VIHI, LLC in I.T.A. No.17/Mds/2012. In the case before this Tribunal, the assessee, VIHI transferred the shares of Visteon Powertrain Control Systems India Pvt. Ltd. to M/s Visteon International Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd. and to M/s Visteon International Holdings Mauritius Ltd. for Rs. 10.32 per share. The assessee has obtained valuation certificate from M/s Delloite Haskins & Sells, Chartered Accountants. However, the Assessing Officer determined the arm's length price of the value of shares at Rs. 36.31 per share. This Tribunal after examining the facts of the case, ultimately found that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....transferred the same. Due to time gap, the fluctuation in the market rate and value of capital asset of the company have to be taken into consideration for the purpose of valuing the shares under DCF method. Therefore, the valuation made for the assessment year 2007-08 cannot be the same for assessment year 2013-14. Since the Assessing Officer has followed DCF method, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the CIT(Appeals) has rightly confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. This Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the lower authority and accordingly the same is confirmed. 11. The assessee has also raised an issue with regard to reopening of assessment. 12. As seen from the grounds of appeal, t....