2018 (5) TMI 1520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... This is an appeal filed against order-in-appeal No. VAD-EXCUS-001-APP-078-2017-18 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I), Vadodara. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant had availed credit of Service Tax paid amounting to Rs. 12,27,760/- on the basis of an invoice/ bill No. 01 dated 31.03.2013 issued by one M/s Swaraj Construction. Alleging that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he said invoice was also wrongly appreciated as the service tax registration of the appellant and consequently, the credit was denied, It is his contention that said service tax registration number belongs to M/s Swaraj Construction and the service tax registration of the appellant is different bearing No. ACHFS7814FSD002. In support he has produced the registration certificates of the service pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2013, it cannot be construed that the transaction is a sale transaction and the appellant are not eligible to credit of service tax paid against such construction service. 4. Ld. AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). 5. I find that the main objection of the department in denying credit of service tax paid against invoice No. 1 dated 30.03.2013 issued ....