Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1476

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent ORDER Per : S.S. Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dt. 07/11/2013 by the Commissioner(Appeals) where by the Commissioner(Appeals) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2.  Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants had filed Bills of Entry No. 268920 dt. 11/02/2010 and No.271282 dt. 10/06/2010 for the clearance of two consi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed contrary to the Circular No.24/2004 issued by the CBEC. He further submitted that the impugned order is also contrary to the decisions of the courts. He further submitted that the Commissioner(Appeals) has wrongly held that the assessment carried out by the Department was accepted in toto by the app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s been held that assessing authority should have assessed the goods at correct rate even if the assessee had omitted to claim the benefit. 5.   On the other hand, the learned AR reiterated the finding of the impugned order. 6.   After considering the submissions of both sides and perusal of material on record, I find that the finding of the Commissioner(Appeals) that once....