2018 (5) TMI 1127
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....upsaran, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 27.11.2017 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are registered as service providers under the category of "mining of minerals, oil and gas s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Commissioner (A), who rejected the appeal. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed without considering the factual and legal position. He further submitted that the appellant received the security services from various security ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....axation, which is not permitted under law. In support of his submission, he relied upon the following decisions: • Angiplast Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST: 2013 (32) STR 628 (Tri.-Ahmd.) • CST vs. Geeta Industries Pvt. Ltd.: 2011 (22) STR 293 (Tri.-Del.) • Navyug Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE: 2009 (13) STR 421 (Tri.-Ahmd.) • Umasons Auto Compo Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE:....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI