Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 1115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate - For the Appellant Mrs. Kavitha Podwal, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S. Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.4.2017 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has rejected the appeal of the appellant and upheld the Order-in-Original. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are engaged in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6,41,056/- for the financial year 2013-14 and Rs. 2,20,258/- (50% of credit to be reversed), totally amounting to Rs. 28,63,786/-. Therefore, a show-cause notice was issued to them for recovery of the irregular CENVAT credit of Rs. 28,63,786/-. After following the due process, the Additional Commissioner vide Order-in-Original dated 10.7.2015 confirmed the demand of ineligible CENVAT credit amount....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner rejected the refund claim on the ground that the appellant failed to produce any documentary evidence to show the excess payment of credit. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant filed the appeal before the Commissioner (A), who also rejected the appeal of the appellant and hence, the present appeal. 3. Heard both the parties and perused the records. 4. Learned counsel for the appellan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntly reversed on 1.12.2015 on the basis of Order-in-Original dated 10.7.2015. In support of his submission, he relied upon the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Gasha Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE vide Final Order No.21334/2017 dated 28.7.2017. 5. On the other hand, the learned AR defended the impugned order. 6. After considering the submissions of both the parties and perusal of the recor....