2018 (5) TMI 1112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ankar - For the Appellant Mrs. Kavitha Podwal, AR - For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S Garg These two appeals are directed against the common impugned order dated 19.9.2017 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby he has rejected the appeals of the appellant. Since the issue involved in both the appeals is identical, therefore, both the appeals are being disposed of by this common order.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal rejecting the refund claim and sanctioned the portion of refund claim rejected by the Deputy Commissioner, thus both the refund claims filed by the appellant stood sanctioned in full. Since there was a delay in sanctioning the refund, the appellant filed a refund claim for interest on delay in payment of refund amounting to Rs. 7,08,924/- and Rs. 10,32,729/-. The said applications claiming int....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law as the same has been passed by ignoring the stay order passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka whereby the High Court has stayed the recovery and in spite of that both the lower authorities have ignored the stay order and have appropriated the interest against the disputed demand, which was sub-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee by various decisions cited supra. Further, I find that the Division Bench of this tribunal in the case of ABB Ltd. has held in para 4 as under: "4. We have heard both sides and perused the records. According to us only one issue to be examined in these cases is whether appropriation of rebate sanctioned in cash against the customs duty arrears is in order. As per the Revenue, the appropri....