Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (5) TMI 918

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri Amit Agarwal, Consultant for assessee-appellant Shri Dilip Shinde, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for Revenue Per: C J Mathew Shri Sushil K Agarwal is in appeal against order-in-appeal no. PUN-EXCUS-001-APP-166-13-14 dated 27^th December 2013 of Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune - I which has, on appeal against order of original authority, r....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ection 65(105)(zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 and with liability that was imposed retrospectively with effect from 1^st June 2007. He pointed out that the presumptions in the impugned order to the effect that non-payment of tax for the period covered retrospectively could not be blamed on the assessee by relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in J K Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....une 2007 when 'renting of immovable property' was made taxable with retrospective effect. Being a retrospective legislation, the assessee-appellant cannot be held to have had any intent to evade tax. At the same time, he was expected to discharge the tax liability at least with respect to the period thereafter. On a perusal of the record, it is seen that the appellant did discharge tax lia....