TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (5) TMI 196
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....Rajesh Gupta, CA for the Respondent(s) ORDER Per : Ashok Jindal Both sides are in appeal. 2. The assessee was engaged in the activity of manufacturing steel tabular poles and located in the state of Jammu & Kashmir paying duty on their activity. The activity explained by the assessee as under: A study of manufacturing process carried out by the Noticee in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nder the nomenclature as "Steel Tubular Pole". 3. The revenue entertained the view that the activity undertaken by the assessee does not amount to manufacture. Therefore, proceedings were initiated against the assessee for denial of Cenvat Credit availed on the inputs used in exempted final products and to cancelled their Central Excise Registration. The matter was adjudicated a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g to manufacture and sought demand of duty along with interest and to impose penalty on the assessee. The show-cause notices were adjudicated, demand of duty was confirmed along with interest and penalties were also imposed. Against these orders, the assessee is before us. 4. Today when the matter was called, both sides agreed that the activity undertaken by the assessee a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y amounts to manufacture, further as the appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was pending before this Tribunal on the premises that activity does not amounts to manufacture. In that circumstances, the assesse's is having limited prayer is that for the intervening period, waiver of interest and penalty be granted to them. 6. We are of the....