Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 1409

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....L) Crl.M.A. 7297/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exception. Crl.M.A. 7296/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 62 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 259/2018 1. Petitioner (APS Forex Services Pvt. Ltd.) filed complaint case no. 613738/16 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as issued. Aforesaid cheques were also returned unpaid vide memos dated 23rd May, 2014 and 27th May, 2014 with remarks 'Funds Insufficient'. Petitioner issued a legal notice dated 7th June, 2014 through registered post but the respondent failed to make the payment. Hence, the present complaint. 2. To prove the case, authorized signatory of petitioner examined himself as CW-1 and tendered ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner. He further submitted that the request letters were forged and fabricated. He also submitted that the cards, for which payment was sought, were not issued by respondent no. 1. 4. Anuj Sharma, respondent no. 2, in his statement recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. stated that he was also a partner of respondent no. 1 and took the same stand as Sushil Kumar. 5. Respondents did not lead any ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... firm of Rs. 6,45,307/-. In discharge of the foresaid liability, four cheques for sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- each were issued. 7. From the documents placed on record, it is evident that USD card for a sum of 15,000/- was issued on 10th January, 2014, however, the travel for the card was allegedly issued to commence from 8th January, 2014. The bill was not raised in the name of individual traveller and....