2018 (4) TMI 1237

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri K.P. Muralidharan, AC (AC) for the Respondent Per Ms. Sulekha Beevi, Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the activity of re-rubberisation of rollers for various industries including printing industry. On the basis of intelligence gathered by DGCEI that appellant had not discharged service tax liability on the services of re-rubberisation of rollers provided by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and 77 of the Act. Aggrieved the appellants are now before the Tribunal. 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. counsel appearing for the appellant Ms. Krithika Jaganathan submitted that the issue stands covered by the decision of the Tribunal in the assessees own case for a different unit as reported in 2016 (44) STR 302 (Tri. Bang.). She submitted that the said activity of re-rubberisation of old....