Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (11) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s is whether the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner dated March 25, 1987, made by him in exercise of his revisional power under section 263, the assessment year being 1982-83. The Commissioner having found that the assessee had suppressed the true value of the property which it had sold, that fact of suppression having come to light when the premises of the purcha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... while exercising powers of revision. The Commissioner, when acting under section 263 of the Act, when he finds that the order sought to be revised is one prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, he may, after giving an opportunity to the assessee of being heard and after making such further inquiry, as he may deem necessary, pass such orders thereon as the circumstances of the case justify, i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessment in whole or in part. The exercise of that discretion is not to be ordinarily interfered with unless the facts show that, that exercise of the discretion itself is required to be characterised as arbitrary. The facts before us do not justify any such inference of arbitrariness on the part of the Commissioner. We also do not see any prejudice having been caused to the assessee. The ass....