Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 975

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r : Mr.Joseph Prabhakar For The Respondent : Mr.K.S.Ravi, SSC ORDER Mr.K.S.Ravi, learned Senior Standing Counsel accepts notice for the respondent. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the respondent in Order in Appeal No.79/2017 (CTA-I) dated 21.8.2017, by which, the appeal filed by the pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of 10% of the disputed tax, which was remitted by the petitioner much prior to the filing of the appeal i.e. on 01.7.2016. 4. However, the mistake committed by the petitioner is that the appeal petition was presented before the wrong forum i.e. instead of filing the appeal in the office of the respondent, the appeal was filed in the office of the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It is stated that on 16.8.2017, the learned counsel for the petitioner made submissions on the merits of the matter. However, by the impugned order, the respondent dismissed the petitioner's appeal as time barred by reckoning the date of filing of the appeal as 03.10.2016 and holding that the appeal has been filed beyond the condonable period of limitation as provided under Section 85 of the....