Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (5) TMI 6

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ome-tax, Jodhpur. The Assessing Officer allowed the following expenses which were shown in the return of income of the assessee-Digvijay Textiles, Jodhpur: Rs. "(1) Advertisement expenses 12,454 (2) Commission paid to selling agent 5,17,107 (3) Sales incentive 96,060 (4) Cash discount 8,99,490 --------- Total : 15,25,111 --------- Later on, on a perusal of the records, the Commis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....within the purview of section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, in view of the decision of the Calcutta High Court in CIT v. Hindusthan Motors Ltd. [1991] 192 ITR 619. As regards the sales incentive, it has been held that it is neither an extravaganza nor a wasteful expenditure and hence cannot be subjected to partial disallowance under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act. Similarly, the cash discoun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x Appellate Tribunal's observation that the expenditure is neither an extravaganza nor a wasteful expenditure is relevant? (3) Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in not upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax action under section 263 on all the points in spite of the fact that the nature of all the expenses was only to boost the sales, so these were clearly covered under sect....