2018 (4) TMI 599

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent ORDER Order per: M. V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 07/2008 (H-ll) CUS dated 21.02.2008 2.  Heard both sides and perused the records. 3.  On perusal of records, it transpires that the issue is regarding the assessment of the goods imported by the appellant, i.e. PVC Flex Sheet Rolls of different sizes from a manufacturer in China. The a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; Ld. Departmental representative reiterates the findings of the Lower Authorities. 6.  On perusal of records we find that the Adjudicating Authority has not issued any speaking order for the enhancement of the value on the goods  imported by the appellant. Enhancement of the value has taken place on the assessment of the Bill of Entry filed for home consumption. Appellant is not disp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s and the appellants have in writing accepted the higher value and paid the differential duty Once accepted the value and paid the duty and thus the assessment is final. As per Section 128, any person who is 'aggrieved' by any decision or order can appeal. At this juncture question of reconsidering  the   assessment does not arise. It can be seen from the above reproduce t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....conclusion is not premised on any legal principle and the revenue having not brought on records any contemporaneous evidence to the contrary, we are of the opinion that it cannot be said to have discharged its burden." 8.  The Division Bench of Tribunal in the case Shri. Shiv Shakti Corporation Ltd., followed the said ratio. 9.  We find that in the facts and circumstances of this case,....