Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (4) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....manabhan, Member ( Technical ) Shri Ravi Raghavan, Advocate & Miss. S.Chatterjee, Advocate for the Appellant Shri S. Guha, AC(AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Shri V. Padmanabhan 1. The appeals are filed by the appellants against the Order-in-Appeal No. 77-79/JSR/2012 dated 24.05.2012. During December, 2004 to March, 2007 M/s. Tata Motors Ltd. (herein after referred as TATA) as well....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....view that the value adopted by M/s. Bhalotia Auto for payment of excise duty was not properly determined. On the basis of investigation carried out and differential duty amounting to Rs. 31,17,366.40 was demanded from M/s. Bhalotia Auto alongwith interest. Penalties were also imposed on M/s. Bhalotia Auto as far as on the suppliers of Chassis i.e. M/s. TATA as well as M/s. VE Commercial. When the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty as well as additional basic excise duty and the education cess and automobile cess. Since the vehicle with the body built on the chasis, was not being sold to the suppliers, the value adopted by M/s. Bhalota Auto for payment of excise duty was determined under section 4(1) (a) of the Central Excise Act read with Rule 11 of Central Excise Valuation Rules. 5. While determining the value the pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase of Collector of Central Excise, Pune vs. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. (supra) has observed as follows: "26. To answer the Question involved in these appeals, in determining the cost of an excisable product by the Modvat scheme under Section 4(i)(b) of the Act read with Rule 6 of the Valuation Rules the excise duty paid on raw material also covered by the Modvat scheme is not to be included.....