Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 1547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dded Tax Act, 2003, inter alia, on the ground that the appeals filed by the petitioner are delayed. According to the learned Joint Commissioner, since he does not have the power to condone the delay under section 62 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, and since the appeals were hit by limitation, he has dismissed the appeals. 2.  Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner, M/s. Wind World (India) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., formerly known as M/s. Enercon (India) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., is in the business of construction of sub-station/switchyard for power evacuation and has constructed and capitalized power sub-stations in different States of the country. The petitioner is registered under the provisions of the Karnataka ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... petition inter alia on the ground that the petitioner had the availability of efficacious alternate remedy in filing an appeal. Since the petitioner was aggrieved by the said order, it filed different writ appeals before the learned Division Bench. The different writ appeals were dismissed by the learned Division Bench on March 21, 2016, relating to the assessment period 2009-10, by its judgment dated April 21, 2016 relating to the assessment periods 2010-11, 2011-12, and 2012-13, and by its judgment dated August 10, 2016, relating to the assessment period 2008-09. 6.  Since this court was of the opinion that the petitioner should actually avail an efficacious alternate remedy for filing the appeal, eventually, the petitioner filed s....