TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1983 (12) TMI 330
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pondents. 3. The Prescribed Authority constituted under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act determined the compensation payable to respondents 3 to 6 for acquisition of the surplus land and trees in the amount of ₹ 90,637. 20 p. The State of U.P. having been dissatisfied with this quantum of compensation assessed by the Prescribed Authority preferred an appeal in the Court o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was barred by limitation. The learned District Judge noted the fact that the allegation that Lekhpal and Sadar kanungo were in collusion with the answering respondents does not carry conviction. The learned District Judge further held that the explanation for not filing the appeal in time is not very convincing and that even though the concerned department had the knowledge about the order which ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sdiction under Article 227 ultimately leading to injustice. This is what the High Court says : May be, if I had considered the matter as the court of first instance I might have taken a different view, but unless it can be held that the view taken by the learned District Judge was not a plausible view that cannot be reversed in exercise of the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution. Artic....