2018 (3) TMI 1280
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Respondent: Mr.Harish Saini, D.R. PER: S.K. MOHANTY Heard both sides. Disallowance of Cenvat credit for non-compliance of the requirement of sub-rule (7) of Rule 4 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is the subject matter of present dispute. In this case, while making the payment to the service providers, towards taxable service rendered by them, the appellant had retained 5% from the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Tribunal as M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Udaipur [Final Order No. 56669/2017 dated 01.09.2017] wherein it was observed as under:- "5. The facts of the case are not in dispute. We note that the original authority after referring to the above mentioned circular of the Board distinguished the same and disallowed the credit of service tax attributable to consideration not paid ....
TaxTMI