Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (7) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....WAHAR LAL GUPTA J.-The Revenue has filed this petition under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It claims that the following two questions of law arise for the opinion of this court: "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in deleting the disallowance of Rs.55,271 confirmed by the learned Commissioner of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... had been working for the past three years. On the basis of this evidence, the assessee's claim for deduction of an amount of Rs.55,271 has been sustained. It is a pure finding of fact based on appreciation of the evidence adduced during the proceedings. No question of law arises. With regard to the second question, it has been claimed by the Revenue that the machine was purchased installed and....